arhgap29 primary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)
Structured Review

Arhgap29 Primary Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 13 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/arhgap29+primary+antibody/pmc12111240-203-10-14?v=Santa+Cruz+Biotechnology
Average 93 stars, based on 13 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Arhgap29 Deficiency Directly Leads to Systemic and Craniofacial Skeletal Abnormalities"
Article Title: Arhgap29 Deficiency Directly Leads to Systemic and Craniofacial Skeletal Abnormalities
Journal: International Journal of Molecular Sciences
doi: 10.3390/ijms26104647
Figure Legend Snippet: General characteristics of Arhgap29 −/− mice. ( A ) Gross image of the E15.5 mice. ( B ) Image of the head of the P0 mice (the black dashed box indicates the mandible). The penetrance of mandibular anomalies in Arhgap29 −/− mice is 30% (3/10). ( C ) Image of the palate of the E17.5 mice. The black dashed line indicates the cleft palate with 31.25% penetrance (5/16). ( D ) Image of the forelimb digits of the E14.5 mice. The black arrow indicates ectrodactyly with 96.67% penetrance (29/30).
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Three-dimensional reconstruction images of micro-CT scanning of WT and Arhgap29 deletion specimens. The white dashed line indicates the outline of the collapsed skull of the Arhgap29 −/− mice. FR, frontal bone; PA, parietal bone; IP, interparietal bone; M, mandible; co, coronal suture; sa, sagittal suture; la, lambdoidal suture. ( B ) The quantitative analysis of the cranium and mandible showed that the average bone surface area, bone volume, and bone mineral content were reduced to varying degrees in both the cranium and mandible of Arhgap29 −/− mice compared with WT mice. BV, bone volume; BS, bone surface; BMC, bone mineral content. All data: *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05.
Techniques Used: Micro-CT
Figure Legend Snippet: Alcian blue and Alcian blue/alizarin red staining results of cartilage and bone in the craniofacial region and limbs of WT and Arhgap29 −/− mice. ( A ) Alcian blue staining was performed on Meckel’s cartilage during three developmental stages: E13.5, E14.5, and P0. ( B ) Alcian blue/alizarin red staining of cranial and facial bones at P0. ( C ) Alcian blue/alizarin red staining of the mandible at P0. ( D ) Alcian blue/alizarin red staining of the whole skeleton of mice. ( E ) Alcian blue/alizarin red staining of the front limbs of mice; the Arhgap29 −/− mice have ectrodactyly.
Techniques Used: Staining
Figure Legend Snippet: Histological characteristics of Meckel’s cartilage. The results of H&E staining of Meckel’s cartilage in E13.5 ( A ), E15.5 ( B ), and E17.5 ( C ) mice, along with Alcian blue staining of Meckel’s cartilage in P0 mice ( D ). ( A – C ) illustrate the coronal section staining results of the mouse head, demonstrating the delayed hypertrophy of Meckel’s chondrocytes in Arhgap29 −/− mice. ( D ) presents the axial section staining results of the mouse head, which reveal the delayed degeneration of Meckel’s cartilage. The red dashed line indicates Meckel’s cartilage (MC); the mandible is labeled as M. Three mice from each group were chosen for every time period.
Techniques Used: Staining, Labeling
Figure Legend Snippet: Experimental results of osteogenesis in mandibular tissue. ( A , B ) Von Kossa staining of mandibular tissue sections from E17.5 mice. ( C ) ALP staining of mandibular tissue sections from E17.5 WT mice. ALP-positive cells (shown in blue) are distributed on the surface of the bone matrix. ( D ) Immunohistochemical staining results of mandibular tissue sections from E17.5 WT mice. Arhgap29 -positive cells (shown in brown-yellow) are located on the surface of the bone matrix. (The red arrow indicates osteoblasts).
Techniques Used: Staining, Immunohistochemical staining
Figure Legend Snippet: Experimental results of osteoclast activity in mouse mandibular tissue. ( A , B ) TRAP staining of mandibles in E17.5 WT and Arhgap29 −/− mice (osteoclasts are stained red, as indicated by the black arrows). ( C ) Staining of osteoclast marker TRAP in mandibles of WT mice at E17.5. ( D ) Immunohistochemical staining of osteoclasts in mandibles of WT mice at E17.5 (with positive cells indicated in brownish-yellow).
Techniques Used: Activity Assay, Staining, Marker, Immunohistochemical staining
Figure Legend Snippet: Analysis of transcriptome sequencing results for E17.5 mandibular tissue. ( A ) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes. ( B ) GO classification annotation and enrichment analysis. ( C ) KEGG classification annotation and pathway enrichment analysis. ( D ) Heatmap of differentially expressed gene clustering in calcium signaling pathway. ( E ) Heatmap of differentially expressed gene clustering in cell differentiation. ( F ) qPCR validation of calcium signaling pathway-related molecules. ( G ) qPCR validation of cell differentiation-related molecules. (The internal reference gene used was Gapdh , and the relative expression of the Arhgap29 −/− group was calculated based on the gene expression levels of the WT group. Statistical analyses of differences were performed using a t -test. * indicates a statistically significant difference between groups. *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; ns indicates no significant difference.)
Techniques Used: Sequencing, Cell Differentiation, Biomarker Discovery, Expressing, Gene Expression
Figure Legend Snippet: In vitro cell experiment results. ( A ) qPCR assay for osteoblast markers in cells 3 days after they were induced to differentiate. ( B , C ) ALP staining of WT and si Arhgap29 cells 7 days after they were induced to differentiate. ( D , E ) ARS staining of WT and si Arhgap29 cells after they were induced to differentiate for 14 days. ( F ) Quantitative analysis of alkaline phosphatase staining in cells ( n = 5). ( G ) Quantitative analysis of alizarin red staining in cells ( n = 5). All data: *** p < 0.001.
Techniques Used: In Vitro, Staining

